Why husband change the wife ?

  I appeal to all those men who have changed the wife. To those who feel betrayed, unhappy, humiliated.

     The Lord, and who told you that the so-called "Wife" shall keep you faithful? Who!

     You thought that if you were full of donkeys - went to the registry office, where a thick aunt announced to you that "from now on you are a husband and wife," the woman standing next to you then obliged to be true to you? On what basis do you say that?

     You did not read the contract under which to put a personal signature. A marriage - this is the contract. The Family Code of the Russian Federation is not even mentioned fidelity. There is no such word. Do not believe me? See for yourself. Even after you call yourself "thrown".

    You believed that ringed woman now belongs to you? Read carefully the Family Code: Article 31. Equality of spouses in the family. "Each of the spouses is free to choose his occupation, profession, place of residence."

    Your so-called "Wife" does not even have to live with you one house. Until 1917, it was required. I did not even have a separate passport. And any constable or police officer would have brought her chemo. And now it is - "a free man".

     You say (or said) "my wife." And what is it "yours"? It is exactly the same, and my woman like your own. To be precise, in our time, and according to our laws a woman - she of the men, whom she considers her. Woman decides. NOT YOU. And the registrar does not limit its ability to belong to one, two, three men at the same time as in the passport of her you cuckold, given her husband. So your imagination, speculation, false belief - it's your personal problem.

     What is the "marriage" you made? This matriarchal contract, where the man upon all women should be, it is also the law does not bear any liability or responsibility - you have signed it. Personally. Voluntarily. You idiots, gentlemen.

    Previously, his unfaithful wife dropped on sharp rocks off the cliff, and now a woman, even if it is "lawful wife", with the information received from you plop in the face you can make a serious trouble for the criminal part. It can even apply for child support for its content being with you in the "marriage". Did not know?

     So, you divorced after your "wife" changed you? Or just want to get a divorce? So, a child who is born in your "former" within 300 days after the official divorce, the woman calmly can write to you. And then you'll be in court for years to prove that it is not the pope. And it's news to you? And all in black and white: Art. 48 of the Family Code, § 2. "If a child was born from persons who are married to each other, as well as for three hundred days after the divorce, annulment or death from the moment the child's mother wife, the father recognizes the child's spouse (former spouse) mother, unless proven otherwise "

     But why did you read the contract in the cabin when buying a car - "a pile of stamped iron", but does not reflect on much more important contract, which determines the quality of your life, your health, property?

     Let's go further. You were the first man from his "wife"? What, can not hear: 5th? 7 th, 25 th in a row? Or tried not to think about it? "Does it matter past the woman if she likes me?" Important. And it is very important.

     I'll tell you what happened: you have brought into your life and your home slut, hole and expect that will be the last guy in her life? Seriously you think so? True?

     No, if you take a virgin "wife", then some kind of speculative reason to expect from her loyalty you had. Base, but not a guarantee, not a legal obligation of the wife to her husband.

     I specify: the virgin - this is not a wench, which is physically preserved hymen, years amused anal and oral sex with boys of his court.

     Virginity - is a moral and bodily integrity, purity, netselovannost.

     And you who were taken to the registrar? The main thing - why?

wiring technology

    Now I will tell you exactly how you have dissolved, what you bought cheap bikes.

     These babskie wiring standard, they will numbered. It's a pity more: many men themselves bear this nonsense. Now I make out common misconceptions concerning the marriage. It is not so much a delusion as beneficial to women manipulative maxims fed men, in order that those were the woman to the registrar.

Bussing first - "If you like, then get married officially"

    This is a typical tendentious Babskii substitution of concepts. Love - the feeling between men and women, to the nature of their personal relationships, I emphasize - in person. The official marriage - a property and a legal contract, the law supported by the state. You can be in a state of marriage, but do not love each other. Is it possible to love but not married. From one another should not be. Love - it's not even necessarily cohabitation: the feeling. People can love each other, but do not live together, but can live, but not love. Marriage and love - this is the concept of the different planes of our life.

    Man, remember: Love and the registrar - are completely different things from one another does not follow.

     The modern formal marriage - it's the same in essence a contract, as well as a thousand years ago, but the agreement is absurd for a party. For this side - for men - the contract provides only a duty, but does nothing: neither the right nor any guarantees.

     Generally, speculation word "love" in relation to marriage for - typical Babskii manipulation. Expose it's very simple: ask a woman to explain exactly how from the "love" to be the need for "stamping" in the registry office, why do love official registration - nothing logical and articulate you will not hear.

     In my humble opinion, love means caring about the interests of someone you lyubish.Tak what kind of "love", if the woman is the man imposes a treaty that it is not just not profitable, and absurd? The answer is very simple and bitter (but honest!): The majority of modern women simply do not care about a man and his interests are, they need a stamp. A love for the particular man here and does not smell.

Wiring the second - "A woman needs reassurance and confidence"

     If you ask a woman, and, in fact, a guarantee that it needs, it will answer something like: "I need the assurance that the man did not leave me any time and I will not stay with nothing after it has spent on a man the best years own life".

     I'll start from the beginning of the exposure.

     So, select "do not give up." In the first place, except in cases related to pregnancy and childbirth of his wife, a divorce for men we have - is voluntary. While, in the least. So, the only guarantee of a long life together, can only be high-quality male and female relationships, love and affection, and not printed in the passport.

     Second, 75-80% of divorces are initiated not just husbands and wives.

     Third, and most important: the question that man must ask a woman to answer should be: "A guarantee to give I?". As has been said, a man formal marriage does not guarantee anything, other than the duties and very possible "popadalova".

      Fidelity - not guaranteed. The Family Code, as I said, this concept is not even mentioned. At all.

     At the same time, these bastards, were born even within 300 days after a divorce with a woman, automatic (!) Are recorded on the ex-husband. Contest paternity is possible, but requires a decent time, financial and energy costs.

     If, before the Revolution, the husband could declare a runaway wife wanted and according to the law to bring her home, and now - and this is written in black and white in the Family Code, the wife has every right to live where she wants and do what she wants without any regard for the opinion of her husband.

     Modern marriage does not guarantee the safety of investments in the male joint project called "family." Moreover, judging by the ratio of "marriages / divorces" itself long duration of marriage is not only not guaranteed, but it looks unlikely (83% divorce rate!)

     Male formal marriage does not guarantee anything, but potential problems and losses.

     Now let's talk about the "broken trough" or how many will be closer, "bare ass." It was then, and is the true motive of the women requiring the infamous "guarantee"! This motif lies not in the field of lifelong family, and refers to ... divorce.

     The modern woman does not want and can not be a normal wife, but she wants to at least converge married. And because it needs guarantees of legalized plunder men at divorce called "division of joint property."

     And finally, about "the years spent at the man": women are self-centered, and in saying this, thought only of her years, but do not consider the year a man, which he will spend on it.

Routing number three - "Marriage - an indicator of the seriousness of the relationship between a man"

     Another option: "Man zastolblyaet woman as her." This is a fantastic absurdity of his argument. Yes nifiga he did not zastolblyaet. Again, read carefully the Family Code: Article 31. Equality of spouses in the family. "Each of the spouses is free to choose his occupation, profession, place of residence."

     In other words, a woman after the registrar - this is not the property of men, and not a free man, who decides where to live, with whom to live, where to work, what to do.

     Now as to the seriousness. If a man knows the nature of modern marriage and facts zakonoprimenitelnuyu practice of this area, but, nevertheless, goes to the registrar - this means that it is simply an idiot. In my view, the seriousness - it is common sense and awareness of the risks, rather than diving headlong into the cesspool.

     There is another important point: if a woman definitely needs a "stolblenii", it is very doubtful that she likes potential suitors, because if she really loves him, how it can be seduced by someone else? The requirement for proof of "seriousness" is intended to conceal from men the simple and sad fact: the status of women married are much more important than the man, his interests and his love.

     It's kind of an ultimatum: "Either you marry, or I'll find another" (fool).

Fourth wiring. - "Normal family - is a registry office"

    Women specifically equate the stamp in the passport and the notion of "family". But if you ask a direct question: "And what, in fact, a way to register a marriage in the registry office determines the family, or create a family?", Then there is no clear answer has not followed. What you will hear will lie all in the same plane tales, fantasies, allegations that are so popular with modern women and that are driven by them in the head unreasonable men.

    In fact, for a normal family, good relationships within it, as is clear to any sane person did not need some kind of stamp.

     Here is a typical Babskii nonsense on "normal family - is when a painting", "Without the registry office - cohabitation, an open relationship, no obligation. No family ...? "

     Again, the question-filling: What specific commitments appear at the woman in front of a man after the registrar and what laws they are determined?

Bussing fifth - the father's rights in marriage

     father's rights (or rather, the almost complete absence of these same rights) in any way, I emphasize - does not depend on whether the child's parents are married? or not. If the child's paternity is established, then the child has the same rights of inheritance as if his parents would have a registrar stamp in their passports.

     One of the common judgment of men: "I want my children to grow up in a complete family." How does the stamp in the passport provides the "usefulness" of the family and his men, paternity, the man did not respond. For one simple reason: he does not know our laws, but simply repeats Babskii abracadabra, inspired him since childhood.

     40 years ago, children born outside of formal marriage could tease. Earlier, before the revolution, bastard had a statutory low social status. But then, the marriage was completely different.

     And who cares about these children now? The percentage of children born without a stamp in the passport, steadily, year after year, approaching the mark of 30% - a fact.

Bussing sixth - Secure and guaranteed sex

     Man, so to speak, is not popular with women: as they say women, "he's not allowed." Now, he finds that she agreed to become his wife. Such a man is sure that sex will now how much he wants. And sadly mistaken. Wife and in quite a "status" does not owe him any sex.

    And now - the moment of truth. "According to expert estimates the average American denies his partner 127 times a year, that is, almost every other day. Similar data for the Netherlands. From these failures woman 67 times "otmazyvat" headache, 28 -.. Fatigue, and 32 attempts at rapprochement intercepted phrase "another time", "I sleep", etc. 90% of women admit that the most effective way to take revenge on the partner - the suspension of "access to the body." Correlate these data with the average frequency of sex. The French, according to statistics, carrying it 152 times a year, Americans - 149 times, Russians - 135. Let us compare with the number of failures 127 and get that one having sex, we have a failure! "

(From the book Olega Novoselova "Woman. Textbook for men")

     But that is not all. Woman Marriage is not only obliged to sexually satisfy her husband, but is not obliged to keep faithful to him: the word is not even mentioned in the Family Code of the Russian Federation. By law, it can not be punished for not only unfaithfulness, but even a forged paternity - pregnancy is not her husband, and concealing from him the fact that the child was not his.

     Many of today's official husbands complain about the lack seksa..s own wife. The proximity has to beg, beg. The quality of sex - worse than ever: timber, moved apart legs and waiting when the man with his peel, does not give a man a full sexual satisfaction. Why is this happening? Because for a hike to the registrar woman often chooses COMFORTABLE her man managed henpecked, sponsor earner. And she wants sex with other men. Most often it does. Once again, the official's wife is not only obliged to "give" you a hunt, but need not be true.

Bussing seventh - "That's when we swear, we would instantly fled without registrar. But an official marriage makes to put up and keeps on hasty, leave momentary and emotional decision "

     The argument is more absurd to think hard. Excuse me, but for the sake of which all stick together, if your married life consists of constant bickering on the verge of breaking up, and relationships are held together only inconvenience divorce proceedings?

Bussing eighth - A special case is the following tale, often told the women in the discussion of "civil marriage against the official."It goes like this: "cohabiting women consider themselves married, much more than men." In other words, in a civil union, de, men think themselves free.

    This dubious argument is an attempt to prove that cohabitation without painting - evil. The data anonymous surveys of cohabiting men and women. Women who consider themselves married, significantly more than the corresponding number of civilian men. Men de, scoundrels, consider themselves free, if there is no stamp in the passport. Women do not understand that this statistic is working against them. If a woman considers herself married, and her husband, a man does not believe, that their civil marriage the woman come up. She just wants to answer. I like to think so.

     If a man writes in the questionnaire, "Single", he does not consider himself a husband, therefore, and no marriage not a marriage (in the form of civil marriage) is not concluded, an agreement with a woman there. And the fact that women often give them the desired for reality - this is not for us something new.

     Confess, my friend, what of the eight listed wirings you dragged to the registrar? To be honest, in the registry office, I would put another registration table, it would be suitors gave crust "Identity moron." At the same time, and a census of the mentally retarded would have spent.

     And there you have the final kick, cuckolds gentlemen. Five facts about modern layout men, officially referred to as "marriage."

• First fact. According to the Federal Service of State Statistics of the ratio of the number of divorces (172 310) to the number of marriages (207,825) for the first quarter 2014 amounted to 82.3% in Russia, ie, over 4 to 5 streaks marriages.
• The fact of the second. In 75-80% of cases of divorce occurs at the initiative of women.
• Third fact. Approximately half of all divorces - divorce spouses who have children.
• The fact of the fourth. 98% of children in divorce almost automatically left with their mothers.
• The fact of the fifth. The year is considered about 124 thousand lawsuits about the place residence of the child.
• The fact of the sixth. Approximately 70% of the divorced mother interferes with the child's communication with her father. Effective way to ensure the child's right to communicate with his father in zakonoprimenitelnoy practice of the Russian Federation still does not exist.

     Eat on health. Saw horn, get rid of excess of calcium in the body.

PS:

      The last warning to the men who still plan to go to the registrar until such time as the men's movement does not hold a radical reform of family laws.

     Friends, from the date of application to the painting usually takes place some time.

     Turn your head. Use this chance to fully weigh the pros and cons (I personally do not know of a single plus for men only cons!), Think about your decision to study the Family Code, statistics and facts of modern marriage. And most importantly - to understand the real motives, the true relationship to you of your women who insist on registration of "marriage." Answer the main question: why is it for you personally?

In the registry office you put a signature under a real contract between you and the woman, a performance guarantee which is the state - so you know the terms of this contract, the rights and obligations of the parties and the responsibility for failure to comply with these obligations. Do not be naive idiots and anti-male hostages, matriarchal law.

     Author: Dmitry Seleznev